According to Stark, the current deflation debate "lacks three important points: an in-depth analysis of the forces driving inflation down; a clear distinction between “benign disinflation” and “bad deflation”, with a spiral of decreasing prices, wages and output triggered by negative expectations; and a better understanding of the European Central Bank’s approach".
Perhaps the most cited extract is the following:
"It is likely we are living in an extended period of price stability. This is good news. It boosts real disposable income and will eventually support private consumption. Inflation expectations are well anchored, and there is no evidence households and companies are delaying purchases because of negative expectations. Warnings about outright deflation and calls for ECB action are misguided and irresponsible. The longer this discussion continues, and the more intense it becomes, the more likely the risk of a self-fulfilling prophecy".
Two questionable assertions immediately struck me, the idea that inflation expectations are well anchored, and the claim there is no evidence households are delaying purchases because of negative expectations.
Well Anchored Expectations?
If these are well anchored expectations, well, I'd like to see what badly anchored ones looked like.....
Purchase Postponement Evidence From Spain's Housing Market
The second claim I find questionable is that we have NO evidence for purchase postponement decisions. The phenomenon may not be widespread at this point - first of all prices actually have to start to fall - but let's take a look at what has been happening in Spain. House prices have now been falling steadily since the end of 2007 (I use the real estate valuers TINSA index).
House prices are now down around 40% and continue to fall. There is no reliable estimate of when the slide in house prices will come to an end, and buyers act accordingly. New home sales, despite a massive stock of nearly a million units (between completed and still to be completed), remain near historic lows, and were down in February over 30% from a year earlier.
It's clear that people are delaying purchases in the expectation of lower prices in the future, and they will continue to do so. Why does this matter. Well, let's look at some charts for Japan.
The collapse in land prices was one of the principle underlying elements driving debt deflation in Japan. In Spain we don't have a reliable land price index (to my knowledge) but it might be worth bearing in mind that before he left the Bank of Spain former governor Miguel Angel Fernandez Ordoñez jokingly told journalists that "well, we shouldn't expect these assets to have negative value, now should we?" Not sure he continues to have a smile on his face when he talks about this. These land assets may now be largely provisioned for and valued at virtually zero, but there are a lot of them remaining on bank balance sheets and stored in the "bad bank" Sareb, and it isn't clear what the impact would be of releasing them at market value on the price of new homes. (Hint, in many urban areas the land cost was roughly 50% of the final house price before the crisis).
To some extent it is the collapse in land prices that has acted as an underlying drag on retail prices in Japan. In the EU HICP housing costs are not included. If they were Spain would already be stuck in entrenched deflation.
Naturally, the Spanish housing market can be discounted by some as an isolated phenomenon, although I would argue it is important enough to make it very difficult to see the ECB being able to raise rates over any foreseeable time horizon due to the pain this would cause to those with mortgages. But how many other examples like this may there be lurking out there? Has Jürgen Stark really run a systematic search, or is he simply repeating - as in the case of well anchored inflation claim - what could be considered to be the official mantra.
Meanwhile we simply watch and wait. Spain EU HICP consumer inflation at minus 0.2% in March over a year earlier.
While Spain's factory gate prices dropped an annual 2.9% in February.
